hmmmmmmmmm.......

Wednesday, March 16, 2005

my footprint....

Check this out: click here to find out how much resources you use up. I knew it would be sobering, but wow.







CATEGORYACRES
FOOD4.2
MOBILITY5.9
SHELTER9.6
GOODS/SERVICES14.1
TOTAL FOOTPRINT34
"IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 24 ACRES PER PERSON. WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 4.5 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE ACRES PER PERSON. IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 7.6 PLANETS."


Yes, I know, it's probably very unscientific, and certainly holier-than-thou, but it's probably somewhat true, and definitely thought-provoking. The intriguing thing is I thought my big sin would come under "mobility" (gas!) but apparently it's all the meat and also processed, not-locally-grown food (all the chocolate, fig newtons, and hamburger helper) that's raising my score. According to the FAQ:

"The Food Footprint includes areas to graze animals, fish, and grow food as well as the energy to process and transport the food. A plant-based diet generally requires less land, energy, and other resources [than a diet with meat and animal products."

They do say that if I eat free-range, grass-fed meat etc that's better.

God, I am getting NOTHING ACCOMPLISHED!!!

Tuesday, March 15, 2005

been posting on MadTeach a lot...

so check it out if you miss my babbling... ;-)

Sunday, March 13, 2005

my rabbit brain

so, tonight riding home in the car I was telling Loopy about some stuff I've been pondering lately...

about how I feel like my rational mind, which makes plans (I think I'll be a teacher!) and carries them out (time for homework!) is in some kind of pitched battle with a basic instinct, animal-level brain which is just stuck in fear, and has been for years.

Here's the theory I've been working on (yes, I'm aware of similarities to many other theories; where do you think this theory came from?): see, the animal level of my brain (or anyone else's--this is supposed to be a general theory) doesn't understand nuances like embarrassment, regret, etc.--the animal brain just understands one binary variable: alive or dead.

This is a problem because the situations that make people feel threatened in modern life are not usually life-and-death situations. instead they are more like, "I am going to flunk out of graduate school," "i am going to get fired," etc.

But the animal brain does not understand this; with each experience of fear, the animal brain stores the key information: "there was a threat, I responded this way, and I survived." THis results in a lot of mis-learned information about how to respond to threats.

What my animal brain did the first time I encountered a situation that overwhelmed my childhood defenses (specifically, the near-simultaneous death of my grandmother and a good friend, while I was also in the throes of a desperate unrequited first love) was freeze up and refuse to do anything. I managed to get through that okay, but later, as life got more and more complicated, my response was the same to every crisis: freeze and hold still and it will go away.

I'm starting to call this my "rabbit brain." You know how rabbits freeze and think you can't see them? That's how I feel when I get "stuck" and feel like I can't do anything. The more I try to do stuff the more I "go unconscious" and discover that another day has passed with me doing some stupid thing instead of my work.

What I finally realized was that my "rabbit brain" must have concluded that this freezing strategy worked. Indeed, when I would freeze long enough, eventually the threat would go away--grad school went away, my various jobs went away...and I didn't die. Obviously, freezing works--if your goal is a rabbit-goal, i.e., make the threat go away and don't die. It's funny, but also not.

It reminds me of our old dog Angel who used to bark at fireworks and then look very proud of herself when they vanished--see ma, I made the scary bang-sparkle-thing go away! Similarly, the rabbit-brain says, "I was scared, I responded this way (shut down, freeze) and I didn't die, so I must have done the right thing." Hmmmm.

Anyway, Loopy wants me to go to bed (wonder why? -- I think we're on Hawaii time at this point), so... I will continue this tomorrow.

Wednesday, March 09, 2005

march weather

doncha just hate those days when it's sorta warm and very windy....

....so you either bundle up and get all sweaty and stinky (hello hat-head!)...

... or you un-bundle and the stinging wind makes your eyes stream and your ears ache?

of course, if you work it out just right, as I did today, you can accomplish the best of both worlds: I'm here in the library with icky hair, sweaty underarms, red eyes and achy ears. Next time I'll pick one option and stick with it.

But y'know, what I really hate is the first warm days (like last friday or whenever it was 60), when the accumulated snow & ice melt, and all the winter's frozen dog poop melts along with it, and the edges of the yard are like a giant poop swamp, and the dogs just stiiiiiiiiink.

you're never coming to the house again, are you?

Monday, March 07, 2005

Italian journalist targeted? or just the entire Iraqi population?

Perhaps you have heard about the US troops shooting at a car carrying an Italian journalist who had just been freed from a hostage situation, along with her rescuer, a member of the Italian secret service. The secret service person was killed and the journalist was wounded. The funeral was a headlining story on the BBC this morning, but no mention of it on CNN or CNN Headline News all morning.

Anyway, there's some interesting coverage of the event on my favorite political blog, Angry Arab News Service. One commenter posted a series of links to articles written by the journalist, who regularly wrote anti-US pieces for the Italian communist paper Il Manifesto, e.g.:
  • Napalm Raid on Falluja? - 73 charred bodies of women and children found
  • Interview with an Iraqi Woman Tortured at Abu Ghraib

    The same commenter also posted a link to an AP article that casts doubt on the "accidental" nature of the event:
    Italian Journalist Rejects US Account
    (Excerpt: "Meanwhile, an autopsy performed on the agent who died trying to save Giuliana Sgrena reportedly showed he was struck in the temple by a single round and died instantly." - doesn't go well with what I heard were the official claims that the soldiers shot at the engine to try to stop the car (would that stop a car?) and that the passengers were hit by shrapnel).

    Then someone else posted this thought-provoking comment:
    "Why does anyone think the US wanted to assassinate Sgrena in particular? A much more damning explanation is that firing 300-400 rounds at a car that poses no particular threat has become standard operating procedure for the US military in Iraq."

    S/he has a point there.





    P.S. Also on the international front, I was confused about the situation in Lebanon, so I did some research and posted about it on MadTeach.
  • Saturday, March 05, 2005

    and in entertainment news...

    okay, i goofed. in my previous post where i said Jude Law was the "premier actor of his generation," i was completely forgetting my perennial fave, Daniel Day Lewis. He has been in a lot of crappy movies but he is a fantastic actor (if you don't believe me, check out "In the Name of the Father," in which he gets framed for an IRA bombing--for once a great flick, and as always, he's fantastic in it). definitely waaaaay better than leonardo dicaprio. i was reminded of this by watching the last few minutes of "gangs of new york" last night, which has both of them in it. watching leo try to convey near-death agony and murderous rage was just ridiculous. lots of huffing and puffing. (whereas w DDL, just closing his eyes was intense.) leo's exertions reminded me of his attempts to convey madness in "the aviator." apparently his idea of strong emotion involves hyperventilation.

    i wrote some more about the film but decided to move it to madteach since it's a good one for history teachers.






    ever wonder what a limpet is?

    you know, as in "clinging like a limpet"?

    here is a whole website that will tell you everything you ever wanted to know about limpets. Some of it is in Norwegian, but the pictures are very helpful. (in case you don't want to click, apparently it's some kind of seashell).

    also from this morning, the news that pumpernickel is not an aphrodisiac. but fresh homemade bread can still make your heart sing (ok well at least your tastebuds).